Salazar v. Buono Addresses the Establishment Clause

This video originally aired on Saturday, October 10, 2009.

About This Video

Joe Davis, Veterans of Foreign Wars Public Affairs Director, Kelly Shackelford, Liberty Legal Institute Chief Counsel, and Peter Eliasberg, attorney for the plaintiff Frank Buono, provide their perspectives on the Supreme Court case Salazar v. Buono shortly after the Supreme Court heard the oral argument.

Discussion Questions

  1. Click here to review the Oyez Project (the U.S. Supreme Court Database) on Salazar v. Buono. Why did the Supreme Court grant certiorari in this case? Explain in your own words the two Constitutional questions involved in this case.
  2. What is the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution? How does this factor into Salazar v. Buono?
  3. Why does Mr. Davis believe the cross his members erected does not violate the Establishment Clause? What does Mr. Shackelford mean when he says, “the Court will look at whether the transfer is a violation of the Establishment Clause”? How does this narrow the scope of the case? Even if the Court declares the transfer was not a violation, why does Mr. Shackelford believe it still will not answer the “ultimate question”?
  4. According to Mr. Eliasberg, how does this case demonstrate a violation of the Constitution? Why does he believe Congress' decision to designate the cross a national memorial further demonstrates the violation of the Establishment Clause?
  5. This clip focuses on one of the Constitutional questions involved in this case. How do you think the second question factored into the case?

Keywords

First Admendment, U.S. CONSTITUTION, U.S. Supreme Court

Related Subjects/Topics

  • U.S. Constitution
  • U.S. Supreme Court

Speakers

  • Joe Davis
  • Peter Eliasberg
  • Kelly Shackelford